May says no to EU proposed deal on the future UK and EU economic relationship and Backstop for Northern Ireland. The EU’s offer to the UK consisted of:
1. UK staying in the European Area and Custom Union. This would mean the UK obeying EU rules and not being able no establish separate trade deals with the rest of the world.
2. Free trade deal that would include Northern Ireland remaining within the custom union to avoid a hard border with the Republic of Ireland (see Good Friday Agreement for more details).
May rejected point 1 because it would fail to deliver on the referendum by staying within European control and without voting rights. Parliament rejected point 2 because it threatens the integrity of the UK union.
May wants from the EU an agreement that sees frictionless free trade of goods that protects the integrity of the UK union in the same way the EU wants to protect its own Union.
respect_ • 43 kB
A curated selection of relevant videos about Brexit.
From this page, you can also download research papers and other materials.
Brexit: a youth perspective • 647 kBReactions & Recommendations taken from a pool of Young People on how the Government should tackle the negotiations surrounding Brexit & the European Union.
Brexit Reading List • 449 kBBrexit: a reading list of postEU Referendum publications by the UK Parliament and the Devolved Assemblies
Britain’s Decision • 5 MBFacts and Impartial Analysis for the EU referendum on 23 June 2016
Post-election survey 2014 • 6 MBThe survey has been used to analyse the results of the European elections in terms of gender, age, region, turnout and voting.
The 2015 General Election • 370 kBAspects of participation and administration
- It includes summary results for general elections and parliamentary by-elections
Election: Turnout • 124 kBThe extent to which voters turnout to vote at elections in the United Kingdom varies considerably between different types of election
EU referendum: one year on • 3 MBFollowing two successful collaborations in 2016 (Brexit and Beyond and Brexit: Six Months On), EU referendum: one year on examines the progress that has been made thus far.
The ‘Outraged Young’ • 3 MBHow Young Europeans are Reshaping the Political Landscape.
- Report on the referendum held on 18 September 2014.
The UK Young Ambassadors • 3 MBEnabling all young people to engage in an Inclusive, Diverse and Well-Connected Europe.
Voting Age • 396 kBThis Note gives details of the attempts to change the law to lower the voting age over the last decade
- This Note gives details of the attempts to change the law to lower the voting age over the last decade.
Voter engagement and young people • 558 kBResearch report.
The government is planning to publish, in two tranches in late August and early September, about 70 technical notices on how businesses and consumers should prepare for no deal.
- It means that pretty much all of the current arrangements that join us to the rest of Europe – covering everything from air transport to pharmaceuticals – would simply vanish.
- The fall in the pound following the original Brexit vote is estimated to have already cost the average household about £400-a-year.
- In principle, aircraft could be grounded, British road hauliers would be unable to operate to and from the continent and border crossings on both sides of the channel could be gridlocked. You might need a visa for your summer holiday, and many UK-based manufacturers that are part of ‘just-in-time’ supply chains could be forced to halt production.
- In practice, it’s likely that the UK and the EU would come up with some emergency measures to stop a complete breakdown.
- The 3.4 million European citizens living in the UK won’t become illegal immigrants overnight and/or UK residents lining in the 27 EU member states.
Brexit-Theresa May • 43 kB
Dominic Raab was thrust into the role of Britain’s chief Brexit minister following the resignation of David Davis over Prime Minister Theresa May’s proposals for trade with the EU.
Theresa May will now lead Brexit talks, with Dominic Raab deputising for her.
Dominic Raab • 25 kB
The future relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union.
Our proposal is comprehensive. It is ambitious. And it strikes the balance we need – between rights and obligations.
- It would ensure that we leave the EU, without leaving Europe.
- It would return accountability over the laws we live by to London, Edinburgh, Cardiff and Belfast, and end the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in the UK.
- It would preserve the UK’s and the EU’s frictionless access to each other’s markets for goods, protecting jobs and livelihoods on both sides, and propose new arrangements for services.
- It would meet our shared commitments to Northern Ireland and Ireland through the overall future relationship, in a way that respects the EU’s autonomy without harming the UK’s constitutional and economic integrity.
- It would end free movement, taking back control of the UK’s borders.
- It would see the UK step out into the world, driving forward an independent trade policy by striking trade deals with new friends and old allies.
- It would maintain the shared security capabilities that keep citizens in the UK and the EU safe, as we work in partnership with Member States to tackle crime and terrorism.
- It would end vast annual contributions to the EU budget, releasing funds for domestic priorities – in particular our long-term plan for the NHS.
- It would take us out of the Common Agricultural Policy and Common Fisheries Policy, ensuring we can better meet the needs of farming and fishing communities.
- It would maintain our current high standards on consumer and employment rights and the environment.
- And it would enable co-operation to continue in areas including science and international development, improving people’s lives within and beyond Europe’s borders.
- In short, the proposal set out in this White Paper would honour the result of the referendum.
- It would deliver a principled and practical Brexit that is in our national interest, and the UK’s and the EU’s mutual interest.
The House of Lords voted in favour of a new amendment for the ‘meaningful vote’, which was passed by 354 votes to 235. Ministers tabled an amendment that would mean a vote only on a neutral motion, which would give MPs no power to halt a cliff-edge Brexit.
Under the new amendment, ministers must update parliament by 21 January 2019 if there is no prospect of a deal with the EU and then have two weeks to return to the House of Commons with a statement on how the government plans to proceed. MPs would then be given a vote on whether to approve the action in statement.
About Me And EU
This project aims to create a one-stop-shop to encourage young voters in the UK to engage in EU affairs by creating an understanding of how Europe influences their daily lives and by connecting them to other young people interested to talk and share ideas on the referendum.
The views expressed in this site are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the UK in a Changing Europe initiative. The UK in a Changing Europe Initiative promotes rigorous, high-quality and independent research into the complex and ever changing relationship between the UK and the European Union (EU). It provides an authoritative, non-partisan and impartial reference point for those looking for information, insights and analysis about UK-EU relations that stands aside from the politics surrounding the debate.